The Norwegian 9/11 Press Conference Group’s Platform

 

Last updated: October 13, 2008.


Pictures to paragraphs 1-3

 

1) We draw attention to the fact that most terrorist acts in Europe and USA have been state-sponsored and directed by Western intelligence organizations. We will here give several examples of false flag-operations and other unethical strategies used by the government to con the parliament and the people into a hostile attitude towards a certain group, and/or to go to war against a certain country.

 

a) Lies in the form of fabricated threats or events (e.g. of being attacked)

·       Sabotage on the battleship USS Maine in Havana Harbor (1898).

·       The Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964).

·       The Kuwaiti incubator baby deception (1990).

·       The Bush Administration’s lies about Iraq having developed weapons of mass destruction that posed a real threat to the United States, a threat that further justified the launching of a preemptive war (2002-2003).

 

b) PALIS-operations

PALIS-operations (“Provoke an Attack and Let It Succeed”) are the kind of operations where the government provokes an attack from the opponent, and the government let the attack succeed even when they have exact preknowledge of when, where and in what form the attack will come.

·       The attack on Pearl Harbor on 7 Dec 1941. Robert B. Stinnett (2001) has in his book documented that US President Franklin D. Roosevelt intentionally manipulated Japan to go to war against USA. Roosevelt considered this to be the only way to get the Americans involved in World War II. American intelligence had decoded the Japanese communication codes, so they knew exactly when and where the attack would set in.

 

c) False flag-operations

False flag-operations can be defined as real attacks or terrorist acts designed in such a way that a certain group (other than those behind the attack) will be blamed thereof. The purpose of the operation is usually to arouse the people’s antipathy against the blamed group. Examples:

·       The German Reichstag fire in Berlin (1933).

·       The attack on the German radio station in Gleiwitz (1939).

·       NATO’s “Operation Gladio” and terrorism in Western Europe, designed to be blamed on the communists (1946- ).

·       Pentagon’s planned “Operation Northwoods” in 1962.


 

2) Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference on 10 Sep 2001, where he announced that Pentagon due to its huge bureaucracy could not account for $2,3 trillion in transactions. This was a blessed day for announcements one wanted to be forgotten the next day. We suggest that the lost and gone money went to future Black budget operations of the kind to be seen the next day.

 

 

3) According to Webster Griffin Tarpley, an international expert in terrorism, the usual procedure in state-sponsored terrorism is to disguise the attack behind, and let it be facilitated by, official war- and antiterror games. Never before or after the 9/11 have such a high number of war- and antiterror games been held at the same time. We suggest that these games were a necessary (but revealing) component of the 9/11 false flag-operation.


Pictures to paragraphs 4-6

 

4) World Trade Center (seven buildings) had during the 1990s become a financial fiasco for the owners, a fiasco on one of the world’s most valueable properties. The health authorities had ordered that the cancer-causing asbestos in the WTC-buildings, over 100 tons, had to be removed, but everyone knew that the bill for such an undertaking would be unacceptable high. Thus, for many of the big investors in New York City, both private and official investors, it would indeed be a blessing if the WTC complex would be destroyed in a catastrophy.

 

According to the official version:

·       the twin towers collapsed due to two big Boeings that penetrated them, and the consequences thereof.

·       WTC 3-6 were damaged beyond repair due to heavy debris from the twin towers.

·     WTC-7 collapsed of unknown reasons, the working hypothesis being that “the initiating event sequence” was local fires and/or debris impact damage (NIST, December 2007).

 

 

5) Concerning the disintegration of the twin towers, the central question is whether they collapsed due to gravity or whether they were pulverized top downwards. By “gravity-driven collapse” we mean that a structural deficiency occurred in the buildings’ hit zones, so that gravity alone was the force behind the assumed downward collapse of the floors. If a gravity-driven collapse of the floors can be excluded, all the technical discussions so far have been irrelevant of what kind of structural damages that were inflicted upon the buildings by eventual planes and the isolated fires that followed.

 

A billiard ball dropped from the 1368 feet high rooftop of WTC-1, would in vacuum hit the pavement in 9,22 seconds. According to NIST Fact Sheet 8, paragraph 6:

 

“NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels to strike the ground after the collapse initiated in each of the towers to be approximately 11 seconds for WTC 1 and approximately 9 seconds for WTC 2... Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall…”.

 

A gravity-driven collapse where the resistance of each of the 100 nether floors had to be overcome would take minimum 20 seconds, and most probably somewhere between 88 to 97 seconds [Judy Wood: A refutation of the official collapse theory (2006)]. We share with Judy Wood the opinion that the twin towers did not collapse, and that all the technical discussions so far about the structural damages inflicted by eventual planes and the isolated fires have been a dead end. Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds suggests that as much as 80 % of the building masses of the twin towers were pulverized during the destruction to aerosol (airborne solid particles), taken by the wind, and dispersed over Lower Manhattan [Wood & Reynolds: The Star Wars Beam Weapons (2006)].

 


A gravity-driven collapse in free fall speed would

imply that the two top sections would reach the ground simultaneously.

 

We stress that the official NIST report:

·       avoids to problematize the free fall speed of the destruction and the extreme degree of pulverization.

·       rejects or ignores the testimonies from 118 out of 503 (= 23%) firefighters and emergency medical technicians who heard and experienced explosions both before and during the destruction of the towers (MacQueen, 2006)

 

In addition to conventional explosives, Judy Wood argues that a type of Directed-energy weapon (DEW), yet kept secret by Pentagon, best explains the disintegration of the twin towers. The peculiar vertical holes (or “cut-outs”) in WTC-5 and WTC-6, plus the strange disappearance of WTC-4 with the exception of the northern wing, could also be the result of pulverization. Judy Wood is also the first to direct our attention to the around 1.400 cars along Lower Manhattan that were destroyed and deformed in highly bizarre ways. [Wiki article on DEW]. 

 

Judy Wood has since December 2007 expressed interest in The Hutchison Effect, which she believes was manifested (and satisfactorily documented) several times around WTC on 9/11 and later. The Canadian inventor and experimental physicist John Hutchison (autobiographical sketch, 1995) is known for his many experiments in which several physical anomalies occur that violate our under­standing of the laws of physics. It seems as if the intermolecular forces are broken in unknown ways. These phenomena, that have been given the generic term The Hutchison Effect, include anomalous bending of metals as if they were made of jelly, abnormally speedy rustification, the occurrence of anomalous holes in metals and glasses without the characteristic fracturing around, the transmutation of metals, “cold fires” that do not consume paper, levitation of heavy objects (not caused by electrostatics or electromagnetism), fusion of dissimilar materials such as metal and wood, and both temporary and permanent changes in the crystal­line structure and physical properties of metal samples. Wood and Hutchison are working on a web-article with commented pictures that indicate that the weapon technology that was used to pulverize the twin towers also resulted in many manifestations of The Hutchison Effect [see: Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect].

 

 

6) The collapse of WTC-7 had all the characteristics of being a conventional controlled demolition. However, the US government has tried to make a grand mystery out of the collapse. NIST presented on 18. December 2007 a preliminary status report, WTC 7: Technical Approach and Status Summary. It says that the work of investigating “the initiating event sequence” that led to “the initial local failure” finally is finished. But what do they mean by “finished”? The report does not conceal that what the “initiating event sequence” might be, is just a “working hypothesis”. What the “initial local failure” might be, is also just a “working hypothesis”. Their working hypothesis is that local fires and/or debris impact damage led to a structural failure below floor 13, with total collapse as the final consequence. Thus, the report cannot verify any debris impact damage at all; this is just a “working hypothesis”! We wonder what kind of mystical debris impact damage it might be, since the debris itself did not go through the roof, did not break a single window, and let the building stand apparently completely unharmed for seven hours.

 

Preknowledge of the collapse of WTC-7 was exposed by a blunder of two reporters reporting too early on 9/11 that WTC-7 had collapsed. First out was CNN-reporter Aaron Brown, who at 16:15 reported that WTC-7 “has collapsed or is collapsing”. The next one was BBC-reporter Jane Standley, who at 16:54 reported that WTC-7 has collapsed. She was standing with her back to the standing building, which all her viewers could see. The building collapsed at 17:20 in 6,5 seconds. In addition to these two embarrassments came the blunder by Larry Silverstein, who in the documentary America Rebuilds (sent in September 2002) claimed that he and the fire department commander agreed to demolish the building:

 

“… and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse”.

 

The only problem with that statement is that a conventional demolition takes at least two weeks of preparations, not three hours. And, by the way, 9/11 was not quite the right day to begin such work.

Pictures to paragraphs 7-8


7) Concerning American Airlines Flight 11, where according to the official version a Boeing 767-223ER with the tail number N334AA hit the north tower (WTC-1), the following comments are relevant:

 

a) A search in the database of Bureau of Tran­sportation Statistics (BTS), where statistics of all flights can be found, showed until November 2003 that there was not a Flight 11 on 11 Sep 2001.

 

b) A search in the N-Number database of FAA (here) shows that the N334AA-Boeing was deregistered on 14 Jan 2002. US Federal Aviation Regulations demands deregistration within 24 hours of destruction.

 

c) Given that there was no Flight 11 on 11 Sep 2001, we are not surprised that neither the government nor the airline has made public an official passenger list. They have instead sent to media 5-10 different “partial passenger lists” with contradictory information. Even if some of the passengers on the partial lists are genuine and died that day, several types of evidence indicate that some of the other passengers on the lists were nothing but fiction.

 

d) Concerning what penetrated WTC-1, witness testimonies and the video recording by the Naudet brothers must be analyzed. Around ten witnesses have been found that suggested something about the size of the flying object. Only three of these have claimed to see a big commercial plane. Two of these three, Sean Murtagh and Mark Obenhaus, had top positions within CNN and ABC News [source: Marcus Icke: WTC1 Witness Reports]. The video recording by the Naudet brothers have been analyzed by Marcus Icke (What hit WTC1?) and Simon Shack (911 Amateur, Part 2). All these data exclude a Big Boeing. WTC-1 was possibly penetrated by a special built big cruise missile.

 

 

8) Concerning United Airlines Flight 175, where according to the official version a Boeing 767-222 with the tail number N612UA hit the south tower (WTC-2), the following comments are relevant:

 

a) A search in the BTS-database confirms a UA Flight 175 on 11 Sep 2001. According to the N-Number database of FAA, the N612UA-Boeing was deregistered on 28 Sep 2005. As mentioned, US Federal Aviation Regulations demands deregistration within 24 hours of destruction.

 

b) Even if some of the passengers on the passenger list were genuine and died in an unknown way that day, several types of data indicate that others on the list were nothing but fiction. Ellen Mariani, whose husband died on Flight 175, has not been able to track down any relatives of the others on the list.

 

c) Concerning the various “live” recordings from the broadcasting companies of planes hitting WTC-2, the best disclosure of these fakes comes from the Norwegian-Swede Simon Shack. He has more than 20 years of experience in video/audio technology. On his website socialservice he has posted several of his 911-documentary series, most known is September Clues Part 1-8 (2007). He exposes obvious TV-fakery from the five big broad­casting companies ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox TV and NBC. As an introduction, it is a fact that a powerful shaking in WTC-2 was registered seismically at 09:02:54, while according to the official story (and the news studios’ “live” recordings) the Boeing hit the building 17 seconds later, at 09:03:11. In other words, the five big broadcasting companies had a delay of 17 seconds in their “live” recording of the event. This must have been planned and coordinated, and been orchestrated from a command centre. The delay was in all the studios introduced by a synchronized audial “beep-beep”. The five big broadcasting companies showed probably only three “live” recordings, sent on the “air” 17 seconds after Real Time. Two of these recordings were manipulated, each of them had a clip of 2 seconds inserted where a CGI-plane (CGI: Computer-generated Imagery) turns up. The third recording (from NBC) seems to be genuine; no plane can be seen, but we can discern a missile-like object descend from the sky.

 

Here are some of the “smoking guns” that show that the five big broadcasting companies served as shills in the 911-Conspiracy:

 

1.     On the Fox-5 “chopper” recording we can see a plane penetrating one side of the building, and the nose of the plane comes out undamaged from the other side of the building! This is quite simply absurd, and proves that it is a CGI-plane. Some­one tried to cover this flop by immediately fading the screen to black, but he/she was 0.28 seconds too late. This flop was never again shown on television, but can be studied by all who recorded the program on their video. When CNN sent the Fox-5 “chopper” recording six minutes later, they had masked the “nose flop” by putting the CNN’s name banner over the event, and they too chose to fade the screen to black in just the right moment. [Watch September Clues, Part 1 (2007) and the sequel Nosed Out (2008)]

 

2.     The “live” recordings of CNN, CBS and ABC are probably identical, and may have been recorded and CGI-manipulated by the professional video animator Devin M. Clark from the firm “Wave Express”. According to Clark, the recording was shot from an office in One Penn Plaza, and given freely to CNN that had offices close by. [Watch 911 Amateur, Part 1]. Timothy David Whidden, a colleague of Clark, was probably also participating in the recording and/or editing. Clark also did the best known recording of the disintegration of WTC-2.

 

3.     On NBC’s morning news program, the camera man is recording from ”Live Chopper 4”, and gives us a magnificent zoomout-view of WTC-2 and the airspace around. We can neither see nor hear any plane when the explosion and the fireball occur. However, a white object (a missile?) can be discerned descending from the sky in a sliding angle, moving towards WTC-2, and apparently being the cause of the explosion and the fireball. When NBC in the evening sent a repeat of the recording, it had been edited: a) the descending white object had been removed; b) a CGI-plane had been inserted; and c) a strong chroma key background had been introduced so that we can no longer see New York City in the background. [Watch September Clues, Part 3].

 

4.     In CBS’s ”live” recording, news anchor Bryant Gumbel talks on the phone with a ”witness” of the explosion in WTC-1, Theresa Renaud. By coincidence, she is the wife of his own boss, CBS producer Jack Renaud. She is talking from an office located two miles away in Chelsea, facing the north side of WTC-2 (while the flying object will hit from the south side). While Theresa is talking, the explosion in WTC-2 just happens and can be seen on the screen. While the TV-viewer is not in a position to see any plane, Renaud claims to both see and hear the plane hit the building. If Theresa Renaud is not gifted with superhuman view and hearing, she must be lying and telling a story that is being dictated by some insider that gives her clues about what to say. [Watch September Clues, Part 1].

 

5.     Why have all the five broadcasting companies inserted strong chroma key back­grounds in their recordings? The morning on 9/11 was a very clear day, so we should expect to see very clearly New York City in the background (as in NBC’s morning news). [Watch September Clues, Part 5] 

 

 

d) Private video recordings and photos that exclude each others genuineness. On the Internet more than 30 private video recordings, plus several photos, can be found of various planes either flying towards or hitting WTC-2. The best analyses of these we find in the web-article of Marcus Icke, The WTC2 Media Hoax (2006), and in three of the short documentaries by Simon Shack (911 Amateur, Part 3; September Clues, Part 2 and September Clues, Part 6). Icke and Shack have reached the same conclusion: most if not all of the recordings and photos can be rejected as fabrications and CGI-manipulated frauds. They exclude each others genuineness in one way or another: in the size of the plane, or in the speed of the plane, or in the trajectory of the plane. Some of these products are made so amateurishly that they even exclude themselves. It seems to have been many forgers that each made their own fake. Each forger made his own personal choices, minor and major errors. There is no indication of any cooperation between them.

 

e) Eyewitness evidence. Marcus Icke has in his article excerpt WTC2 Witness Reports (2006) analyzed what around 30 witnesses have told. Most of them confirm that they saw a plane. Only 13 of them had something to say about the size or the type of the plane. Only two identified witnesses saw a plane that might have been a Boeing 767: Stanley Praimnath and Richard Polatchek. Nine of the other witnesses described the plane as medium or small-sized, or of a military or unknown type. Several of the witnesses remarked that the plane came from the south (from the Statue of Liberty), that it made a U-turn, and that they were surprised how easily it penetrated the wall of WTC-2.

 

Our conclusion.  WTC-2 was possibly penetrated by a special built big cruise missile. If the 911-directors really had sent a Boeing passenger plane to hit WTC-2, and we know that they wanted to maximize the psycho­logical effect of the terror drama, nothing would have been easier than to give us crystal clear camera recordings, from all possible angles, of the real event. All these recordings would confirm each other. 

 

  

Pictures to paragraphs 9-10


9) Concerning American Airlines Flight 77, where according to the official version a Boeing 757-223 with the tail number N644AA crashed into the western wall of Pentagon, the following comments are relevant:

 

a) A search in the BTS-database showed until November 2003 that there was no Flight 77 on 11 Sep 2001. According to the N-Number database of FAA, the N644AA-Boeing was deregistered on 14 Jan 2002.

 

b) It can be verified, exclusively on the basis of physical and quantitative measurements, that no big Boeing hit and penetrated the walls of Pentagon (Dewdney & Longspaugh 2004). Neither inside nor outside the building were any substantial parts of a big Boeing found. No marks or damages were seen on the wall where the wings and the tail of a big Boeing in high speed inevitably would have made quite an impression. Even the windows remained intact after the “crash”! In order to believe that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon wall in high speed and then just vaporized into sweet nothing, it is necessary to regress to the age of magical thinking.

 

c) It is documented well enough that a powerful detonation occurred at 09:31:40 that made the western wall of the Pentagon building collapse. Wrist watches and wall clocks stopped, and thus froze the exact time of the event (Honegger, 2006). The official version, represented by The 9/11 Commission Report (2004), does not accept that anything dramatic at all happened at Pentagon before 09:37:46, when they claim that the building was hit by Flight 77. This was the time for the second powerful explosion at Pentagon. With reference to the two documentaries produced by Citizen Investigation Team (CIT), The Penta­Con, The Smoking Gun Edition (2007) and The Pentagon Flyover: How They Pulled It Off (2008), we support the so-called “flyover” theory. The documentaries show that several witnesses with 100 % certainty saw a large grey or silvery plane come in very low from the north side of the Citgo gas station and flew directly towards the western wall of Pentagon. According to the official version, the plane came in from the south side of the Citgo, toppled five light poles, and penetrated the building in a 45º angle. Since the plane came in from the north side, we have to conclude that the plane cannot have hit Pentagon, but must have flown just above the rooftop in a carefully orchestrated show designed to give the illusion of Flight 77 hitting Pentagon. Persons on both sides of Pentagon (the Citgo witnesses on one side; Scott Cook and Steve Chaconas on the other side) were convinced that a commercial plane had hit Pentagon. Chaconas confirms that the plane came in from the east side of the Potomac River. The film team CIT has found a witness to the flyover, Pentagon police officer Roosevelt Roberts. An interview with him will soon be published on CIT’s web-site. An implication of this research and these witnesses is that the Pentagon Building Performance Report (Jan. 2003) is a sham.

 

d) There is no official passenger list. An incomplete passenger list was, however, “leaked” to CNN and published. There are reasons to believe that many of the passengers on this list was nothing but fiction.

 

e) As one more example of how the most important news media acted as shills in the 911-drama, let us mention Mike Walter, a reporter from USA TODAY. On the 9/11, and later in every interview that he was forced to give, he claims that he saw a Boeing passenger plane penetrating the Pentagon building. He not only saw the plane’s AA-insignia, he could also tell the world what happened to the mysteriously missing wings. When the Boeing penetrated the building, the wings got folded backwards and into the plane, “like an accordion”! We don’t know who wrote this stupid script for Walter, but today he is probably alone in the world supporting this explanation of the missing wings. [Watch September Clues, Part 3]. 

 


10) Concerning United Airlines Flight 93, where according to the official version a Boeing 757-222 with the tail number N591UA dived vertically and sort of penetrated the ground a few yards from the forest line near Shanksville in Pennsylvania, the following comments are relevant:

 

a) A search in the BTS-database confirms a UA Flight 93 on 11 Sep 2001. According to the N-Number database of FAA, the N591UA-Boeing was deregistered on 28 Sep 2005. Another indicator that this Boeing continued to be used as a commercial passenger plane long after 9/11, is the experience of Dave Friedman. One of his hobbies, as a plane passenger, was to log his flights. On 10 Apr 2003 he was on his way to Los Angeles by Flight 1111. According to his log, this was a Boeing 757-222 with the tail number N591UA. This is of course no evidence, but worth mentioning considering all the falsified and fabricated information given by the official 9/11 version (source).

 

b) There is no doubt that Flight 93 landed at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport around 10:45. The passengers were brought out of the plane around 11:15 and led to an evacuated building close by, NASA Glenn Research Center. Here all tracks of them disappear, no one has ever seen them again. The government has tried to create confusion around this by saying that Flight 93 has been mixed up with Delta Flight 1989, which landed at Cleveland around 10:10. The 69 passengers from Flight 1989 had to stay in the plane until 12:30. They were then brought to FAA Headquarters where they were being interrogated for three hours before they were allowed to go. The landing of Flight 93 at Cleveland was first confirmed in a press release sent out 11:43 by the Mayor of Cleveland, Michael R. White. Several employee at the airport (which knew nothing about a conspiracy going on) confirmed to local newspapers and local radio stations that the passengers from Flight 93 had been brought to the evacuated NASA building. The best analysis of the events is the web-article The Cleveland Airport Mystery (2006) by Woodybox.

 

c) According to the official version, Flight 93 dived vertically in 48 seconds before hitting the ground in Shanksville. This version is very far from the stories given by the 25 known witnesses. As a matter of fact, not even one of the witnesses has supported this dive version. According to the official version, the fore part of the fuselage was immediately vaporized when the plane hit the ground, while the back part of the fuselage penetrated deeply below the ground and left a crater. The size, the form and the exact position of the crater, and the absence of body parts and debris from a Boeing in or around the crater, exclude the possibility that a diving plane (of whatever kind) made that crater. [Ref: John Doe II: UA 93: Part II: ... and kiss the official UA 93 theory good-bye!]

 

d) An analysis of the stories given by around 25 witnesses suggests a carefully orche­strated show designed to give the illusion of a plane crash, in the same manner as at Pentagon. The crater had probably been prearranged some days before, with some undetonated explosives inside that could be triggered by an electronic signal. A commer­sial plane that apparently had serious engine problems was seen coming in low over the treetops. Some seconds after the plane had disappeared from view behind the treetops, an explosion was heard, and everybody assumed that the plane had crashed. Around 12 witnesses saw a small, white, unmarked plane – possibly an Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) – flying around the crater both before and after the explosion. This plane may electronically have triggered the detonation of the explosives. We recommend to watch the interview with witness Susan McElwain, Susan McElwain: Uncut 9/11 Shanksville Eyewitness Testi­monial (2007). The 911-show also included that from another plane, high up in the sky, a load of rubbish, personal items and books were dropped over the area of Indian Lake Marina. This act should create the rival theory that Flight 93 was shot down, an idea that was further supported by a “slip of the tongue” comment by Donald Rumsfeld. What FBI later claimed to have found deep down in the crater, when they had it all by themselves, as a hand-written letter by Mohamed Atta and a red bandana scarf by one of the other “hijackers”, few can take seriously. 


 

Pictures to paragraphs 11-15

 

11) The facts given above (points 7 to 10) indicate that only the UA Flights 175 and 93 were real, while the AA Flights 11 and 77 were fabrications. We have mentioned facts that indicate that the two UA Flights neither were hijacked nor crashed. Possibly, the pilots were ordered to land on an evacuated airport, where the crew and the passengers were killed. From this perspective it is not necessary to argue that the trillion dollar US Air Force had been given a “stand down order” for 105 minutes, because there were no hijacked planes that the Air Force ought to repond to.

 

However, if we are to believe the official version that four big Boeings had been hijacked by 19 Arab terrorists, then we have to believe that the trillion dollar US Air Force had submitted to a “stand down order” for 105 minutes.


 

12) If no big Boeings crashed on 11 Sep 2001, then there were no hijackers. The conclusion is that the official version about what the 19 “hijackers” did that day, is nothing but fabrications. We ask why FBI on its website still has the original press release from 27 Sep 2001 (here) where the 19 “hijackers” are presented. According to FBI Director Robert Mueller, this presentation should be free from errors of the kind that the hijackers had borrowed or fabricated identities. We ask why FBI has neglected to update the webpage despite the fact that seven of the so-called hijackers are still alive and free from all suspicion by the US government (article). We interprete this sin of negligence as an admission of failure, that the official version is too frail for revision. 

 

 

13) Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor for President Jimmy Carter (1977-81), has the doubtful honor of being the initiator behind the creation of the terrorist network al Qaeda (“the Base”) in the summer of 1979, realized by the help of CIA, MI6 and the Pakistani intelligence organization ISI. It was in this context that contact was established between CIA and Osama bin Laden. CIA has all the time, by discreet use of middlemen, used al Qaeda as an instrument for US foreign policy. CIA was controlling the al Qaeda terrorist cell led by the double agent Mohamed Atta. This cell of 4 to 5 persons was given the assignment to hijack one or several planes. Their preparations for this event has been well enough documented. On 9/11 they may even have turned up at some airport in order to hijack a plane, just to be stopped and eliminated in a discreet way before going aboard. Mohamed Atta and his group had been under close surveillance for a long time by factions within CIA, FBI and Pentagon. CIA had set them up as patsies by giving them the assignment. We recommend the following articles: The Pentagon Attack Papers by Barbara Honegger, and Able Danger adds twist to 9/11 by Daniele Ganser.

 

Al Qaeda terrorist cells are today being used as mercenary terrorists by various intelligence organizations to execute false flag-operations. Most al Qaeda terrorists have a modern western mentality. They have no particular relationship to Islam, and Muslims do generally not identify with them. The most thorough study so far on al Qaeda (“the Base”), is the book The war on truth: 9/11, disinformation, and the anatomy of terrorism (2005) by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed. We recommend a study of this book, though we disagree with the author’s LIHOP conclusion, that the US government with preknowledge let the 911-attack happen.

 

 

14) What happened with Osama bin Laden, and just as important: what happened with the Bush Administration’s will to capture him? On 13 Sep 2001 President Bush stated: ”The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him.” Precisely six months later Bush had lost all interest. On 13 Mar 2002 Bush stated: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority.”

 

Afghan, Pakistani and Israeli sources claim that Osama bin Laden died in mid-December 2001, and that he was buried in the mountains in the southeast of Afghanistan. On 13 Dec 2002 sympathizers of bin Laden in Afghanistan announced that he died on 10 Dec 2001. Bin Laden had a kidney disease that probably needed dialysis each third day, which must have been difficult to organize as a fugitive and cave-dweller in the Afghani mountains. Not many hours had passed after the 9/11-attack before Osama bin Laden had been made the chief suspect by the American government. The two chief responsible for this rumour were CIA Director George Tenet and Richard A. Clarke, national security advisor for four presidents. Pictures of bin Laden were sent on television channels all over the world.

 

After the 9/11 one interview, three video recordings and various tapes, supposedly by Osama bin Laden, have come forth. We assume that the interview published in the Karachi-based daily newspaper Ummat on 28 Sep 2001 (here) is genuine. This interview was suppressed in USA. The video that Pentagon made public on 13 Dec 2001, where bin Laden takes the credit for the 9/11 terrorist act, is definitely a fabrication ”made in USA”. The only purpose of the video seems to be to provoke aggression and hate in the American people. Tapes and videos from 2002 onwards we consider to be fabrications. In 2007 there were new rumours of him being alive (here). Who knows? Who can you trust?



15) One of the oddest arguments that the defenders of the official version often present, is that if the 9/11-attack had been an inside job, such a huge project surely would have had many leaks. This is a strange argument, because stages of the project have actually leaked for several years. The first leak came with the exposé of Operation Bojinka in 1995, which included a plan for hijacking several passenger planes and crash them in World Trade Center and Pentagon. Leaks have also been exposed in the form of advance warnings from intelligence organizations all over the world (article by Ruppert 2002), insider trading the days before 9/11 (article by Ruppert 2001), and an orgy of transactions in WTC on 9/11 (article by Jeff Wells 2005). Advance warnings have, however, been interpreted as if the al Qaeda terrorists were the main culprits in leaking information about their own project. That may be part of the answer, but only the most superficious part of the answer.

 

With the insight that CIA via the Pakistani intelligence organization ISI was the string-puller behind the Mohamed Atta-group’s hijacking plans, and that no big Boeings crashed on 9/11, these advance warnings should be re-evaluated. It was the Cabal’s own 9/11-project that leaked. The sources of the leaks can have been the string-pullers themselves, and/or the many in subordinate positions that had to be given a need-to-know knowledge about the project, and/or the Atta-group.

 

Pictures to paragraphs 16-19

 

16) Even though USA formally is a democracy, many share the opinion that USA since the presidency of Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) in practice has been a hidden oligarchy governed by a non-elected Establishment. This Establishment controls especially the foreign and the economic policy, but it also influences the academic and the cultural activity by what it chooses to support and by tabuing certain subjects. This Establish­ment exercises power from the inner circles of various secretive front organizations and orders, of which the most important are:

·       The Order of Skull and Bones (created in 1832)

·       The Federal Reserve, responsible for the partly private central banking system of USA (created in 1913).

·       The Council on Foreign Relations [CFR], (created in 1921).

·       CIA (created in 1947).

·       The Trilateral Commission (created in 1973)

 

In reality, it doesn’t matter much which of the two parties is in government, or who the presi­dent is. A majority of presidents, presidential candidates, secretaries of state and secretaries of defense have from the 1920s to the 1960s come from CFR, and since the 1970s most of them have come from CFR and/or the Trilateral Commission. David Rockefeller have dominated both the CFR and the Trilateral Commission. Apparently he governs the foreign policy of the Republicans by Henry Kissinger, and the foreign policy of the Democrats by Zbigniew Brzezinski. Kissinger and Brzezinski can thus be said to be David Rockefeller’s political right and left hands. In 2004 both of the presidential candidates, John Kerry and George W. Bush, were members of The Order of Skull and Bones.

 

In the 1990s a clique of neocon politicians and ideologists – including Irving and William Kristol, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfo­witz, Lewis Scooter Libby and Richard Perle – worked out their own megalomaniac plans for world hegemony. We suggest that the 911-drama was an administrative neocon coup d’état where the neocon faction of the Establishment intensified the control and rule over the admini­stration, congress, media and the population in order to further their own New World Order (NWO) plans. That the 911-terror was an administrative neocon coup d’état has in various versions been promoted by authors and insiders like Donn de Grand-Pre, Maurizio Blondet, Webster Griffin Tarpley (Tarpley 2007), Peter Dale Scott (Scott 2007) and Ed Encho (Encho 2008). President Bush may have been ignorant of the coup d’état, and the 911-directors may have held open the possibility of killing Bush in the drama. In that case, vice president Dick Cheney would become the new president. However, Bush accepted the new worldview given by the 911-directors, in which al-Qaeda was the perpetrators of the 911-terror. Bush’s acceptance was expressed in his speech to the nation on 9/11 20:30 PM. Since that speech, president Bush has functioned as the new worldview’s primary symbol and spokesperson.

 

Some words must be said about the deeper historical context. An elite group of international bankers and industria­lists realized at the end of the 1800s that they could not secure their power in a capitalistic and democratic society. They could only secure and increase their power in a totalitarian-monopolistic society in which they as oligarchs could rule behind the State. Antony C. Sutton (1925-2002) has in his many books called this form of government for corporate socialism. The mentioned elite group has now for over a century systematically worked for the creation of a totalitarian world government charac­terized by corporate socialism. It is precisely this totalitarian world government that all the world leaders through the 1900s have referred to by the expression “a New World Order” (NWO) (see this collection of quotations).

 

The first step towards a New World Order is to undermine the countries’ national sovereignty by first creating free trade agreements (like NAFTA in 1994), and then to establish regional unions of nations (like the European Union in 1993 and the soon to be North American Union). According to Daniel Estulin, in his book The True Story of the Bilderberg Group (2007), it was only thanks to the effort of a few journalists in 1996 that stopped the plans of the Bilderberg group to breakup and fragmentize Canada in 1997. The man who most clearly has expressed the aim of creating a world government, is David Rockefeller. Many consider him to be the head of the NWO Conspiracy, with Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski as his two front men in their governmental roles as national security advisors.

 

There is nothing wrong with transnational globalization as long as this process is directed in a democratic way by the people, and as long as the process has a humane and holistic foundation. However, a transnational globalization that primarily is driven forward by a financial elite that come together in secret and secretive organizations like the Bilderberg group, and who in no way is directed by humane or holistic ideals, we have to warn against and try to stop before it is too late.

 

For a study of the NWO Conspiracy, we recommend the books by Antony C. Sutton (click here for eBooks and summaries); The Shadows of Power (1988) by James Perloff; The Creature from Jekyll Island (4th ed., 2002) by G. Edward Griffin, and the web-book War against Humanity (2008) by Rolf Kenneth Aristos. 


 

17) Based on the new, artificial worldview, the Bush-Cheney neocon clique has in the seven years since the 9/11 come very far in transforming USA to a totalitarian police state with total surveillance over its own population. Naomi Wolf has in her book The End of America (2007) described the main features of this transformation [see her lecture given on October 11, 2007, which is based on her book (YouTube, 48 minutes)]. However, with reference to Webster Griffin Tarpley’s book Obama – the postmodern coup (April 2008), we disagree with Wolf’s characterization of this transformation as “fascism”. Fascism is an oligarchic strategy; and always begins with a charismatic leader whipping up a popular mass movement, a protest movement from the street, of young, frustrated anti-Establishment persons that are injected with a strong sense of belonging and national mystique, and that are driven to violence and fanaticism. Fascism has thus a diametrically opposite birth than what begins with an authoritarian, bureaucratic, oppressive, police state dictatorship, though the former usually ends up as the latter. Mussolini, Hitler and Franco appear in retrospect as right wing extremists, but when they seduced the masses they appeared as radical socialists and revolutionaries.

 

The transformation of USA to a totalitarian surveillance society can be seen in the form of:

  • new laws and changes of old laws that give the president and the intelligence more power to do whatever they want, with only a minimum of justification and accounta­bility, at the expense of the Congress and the people. [Links to analyses of USA PATRIOT Act I (here); Alex Jones’ analysis of the planned PATRIOT Act II (here)].
  • the creation of Department of Homeland Security, which primary agenda seems to be to bleed the US Treasury through pointless security measures and to create and maintain a permanent feeling of insecurity in the population [review of book by James T. Bennett (2006)]
  • The Bush administration has prepared for martial law (Global Research, March 2007) and “Catastrophic Emergency” (Global Research, May 2007) in order to give the president dictatorial power (Washington Post, May 2007).
  • the Establishment’s control over mainstream media has become significantly stronger after 9/11. We recommend the book Into the buzzsaw: leading journalists expose the myth of a free press (2nd ed., 2004), edited by Borjesson.
  • gigantic programs for “Big Brother” surveillance and spying on the US citizens have been proposed, and some of the projects have already been realized. [Sources: Wiki article on Total Information Awareness programs; Wiki article on Operation TIPS]
  • potential concentration/detension camps are being set up all over USA, and a global network of secret US prisons are already active in which around 14.000 prisoners are being held (source).
  • The bill “The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act” sets the freedom of thoughts, opinions and expressions in danger. The law has already passed the House on a vote of 405 to 6, and will soon be voted for in the Senate. Read this article by Mike Adams (28. Nov. 2007), Senate Bill 1959 to Criminalize Thoughts, Blogs, Books and Free Speech Across America.

 

18) Much helped by the new, artificial worldview, political leaders in Europe that are supporting the totalitarian transformation in USA have dared to arrange new false flag terror attacks. The terrorist acts in Madrid on 11. March 2004 (when José María Aznar was prime minister) and in London on 7. July 2005 (when Tony Blair was prime minister) were most probably state-sponsored. We refer to Tarpley’s book 9/11 Synthetic Terror (4th ed., 2007) and to Alex Jones’ documentary Terrorstorm.


19) The European Union (EU) is an elitarian project with the same goals as those of the US Establishment: they try to establish a neoliberal economic policy as a supra­national law. EU is now slowly but surely trying to implement the same totalitarian control over its member states that the Bush-Cheney neocon clique has implemented in USA. One example of this is the Directive 2006/24/EU, which was implemented by the member states on September 15, 2007 (Wiki article). The purpose of this data retention directive is claimed to be to fight terrorism. One of the very few NGOs to fight the nation’s acceptance of this directive, is Digital Rights Ireland. The European Commission, the EU’s executive arm and the motor of European integration, has shown little respect for democracy in the way they have been trying to force through a European Constitution. When this Constitution was rejected by the Netherlands and France in 2004, they just modified it slightly and gave it a new name, the Treaty of Lisbon (2007). Even this treaty was turned down, this time by the people of Ireland in June 2008. The EU has developed some very odd directives where the purpose is to fool the people and to make profits easier for the “Corpocracy”, like Codex Alimentarius (see lecture by Rima E. Laibow, 2005).

 

♦  ♦  ♦

 

Though many of the details of the 911-attack are still unclear and seem difficult to investi­gate, we stress that there can be no doubt that this attack was a state-sponsored false flag-operation initiated and ordered by factions of the Establishment, with help from moles in top positions within the administration, the govern­ment, the intelligence, Pentagon and the media. Today, seven years after the event, it is easy to see some of the primary goals of this false flag-operation:

 

      a) to use ”the war on terrorism” as an excuse for the transformation of USA in the direction of a totalitarian society with total surveillance over its own citizens, and to make it easier for the European Union to implement the same transformation by a stack of directives to its member countries.

 

      b) to use ”the war on terrorism” as an excuse for a dramatic increase in the US military budgets.

 

      c) to create a new global enemy after the fall of the Soviet Union and communism in 1991 that can unite the Western countries and keep alive the NATO alliance. The neocon clique is known for their hatred of Muslims and Arabs. They have tried to create in the collective consciousness the idea of a “Muslim global terrorist conspiracy” without headquarters and with sleeping cells in all the world’s countries, and that this conspiracy is a threat to everybody as long as Islam as a religion exists. With this new global enemy the “perpetual war” has become a reality. The big corporations that sell services and products related to militarizing and security can now look forward to a comfortable and promising future.

 

      d) to use ”the war on terrorism” as an excuse for overthrowing the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. The Taliban regime had become too bossy and demanding concerning USA’s interest in building oil and gas pipes across Afghanistan from Central Asia to Pakistan. By overthrowing the Taliban regime, CIA could also re-engage in the extremely profitable business of importing opium and heroin to USA. Michael Levine has documented that CIA at least since the beginning of the 1970s has been the Great Facilitator who made it possible for the drug cartels to import heroin and cocaine to USA. Without this help from CIA, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) would easily have won the “War on Drugs”, or at least have had full control over the situation. We recommend Levine’s essay Mainstream Media: The Drug War Shills.

 

      e) to get all the seven WTC-buildings demolished without paying a dollar to get the cancer-causing asbestos removed, and then to build new highly profitable skyscrapers at one of the world’s most valueable properties.

 

 

We take note of the fact that the most authoritative bastions within science, politics and news media in Norway are so controlled by ideology or conventionality that they cannot, or dare not, join a fair and unbiased dialogue about 9/11 that acknowledges the facts.
 

The Leftist movement has failed just as much as the Conservative movement. We suggest that both of the political sides have failed to recognize the truth because the very fact of a non-elected Establishment that controls the state, the intelligence and both parties, and that further controls the academia and the mainstream media, has been disguised so well for so long in our culture. Every attempt to make this fact better known among the public have been met with silence or ridicule by the controlled academia and the controlled mainstream media, and then pejoratively classified as “just a conspiracy theory”. According to Daniel Estulin, in his book The True Story of the Bilderberg Group (2007), there was cooperation between Noam Chomsky and a Henry Kissinger team in the mid-1960s to create the “New Left”. We agree with the analysis of Barrie Zwicker, in his book Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-Up of 9/11 (2006), that Chomsky as a Leftist Gatekeeper has had a major role the last 40 years in obstructing the Leftist movement from realizing the existence and influence of the hidden oligarchy.

 

We concur with the following appeal from President George W. Bush to United Nations General Assembly in his speech on 10 Nov 2001: [video stub]

 

"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th., malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty."

 

 

The Norwegian 9/11 Press Conference Group

 

 

As a general reference to the information that has been presented here, we refer to Rolf Kenneth Aristos’ summing up of the research literature in his Norwegian and privately printed book The 9/11 Drama: The Cabal’s Strategic Chess Move (2008). Still, the conclusions and opinions expressed therein are not necessarily ours.

 

 

[Note: The Norwegian 9/11 Press Conference Group stood together behind the first edition of this Platform document, published on September 7, 2007. Later modifications of this Document have been done by WebMaster. The single members of the Group may not have taken a stance or expressed agreement with these modifications. For information of each single member’s stance to the Group or to the Document today, please contact them]. 



Home